On 01/05/2008, at 10:06 PM, Eli Krantzberg wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I used to be a Samplecell user and loved it! You have to remember, it > was a different world back then :-) Samplers were limited in RAM and > believe it or not, Samplecell's 32 meg capabilities were quite trend > setting! > > LM refers to "limited". Many samples libraries shipped with LM or > limited versions of the their instrument mappings as a memory saving > convenience. The LM (lm) versions often didn't have as many multi > samples or as many velocity layers - and so took up less ram, > allowing you to load more instruments at once. The idea was to use > them when you were only using the instruments for limited types of > parts where you didn't need the entire sample range represented in > full glorious ram hogging detail. > > Enjoy! Some of those old samplecell sounds killed!! Thanks for the detailed information Eli. Yes I remember the SC as well. I also have fond memories of my first sampler - an Ensoniq Mirage ;-0. The lm is as I had suspected. By today's standards it's not even worth converting them I reckon. Just convert the full versions and I'm done. Kind regards ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Paul Najar Jaminajar Music Production www.jaminajar.com ------------------------------------